Continuous support during labour beneficial

January 01, 0001

Continuous support during labour beneficial

Clinical Question:
How effective is continuous, one-to-one intrapartum support when compared with usual care?

Bottom line: Continuous support in labour increased the chance of a spontaneous vaginal birth, reduced intrapartum analgesia, caused no known harm, and women were more satisfied. In addition, labours were shorter, and women were less likely to have a caesarean section or instrumental vaginal birth, regional analgesia, or a baby with a low 5-minute Apgar score. There was no apparent impact on other intrapartum interventions, maternal or neonatal complications, or on breastfeeding. Subgroup analyses suggested continuous support was most effective when provided by a woman who was neither part of the hospital staff nor the woman’s social network, and in settings in which epidural analgesia was not routinely available.

Caveat: No conclusions could be drawn about the timing of onset of continuous support. The subgroup analyses should be interpreted with caution. Individually, each should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating, particularly as the sample size in one subgroup was much smaller than in the other. There remains relatively little information about the effects of continuous intrapartum support on mothersÕ and babiesÕ health, and wellbeing in the postpartum period.

Context: Historically, women have been attended and supported by other women during labour and birth. However, in many countries, as more women are giving birth in hospital rather than at home, continuous support during labour has become the exception rather than the norm. Modern obstetric care frequently subjects women to institutional routines, which may have adverse effects on the progress of labour. Supportive care during labour may involve emotional support, comfort measures, information and advocacy.

Cochrane Systematic Review: NHodnett ED et al. Continuous support for women during child.birth. Cochrane Reviews, 2011, Issue 2. Article No. CD003766. DOI:10.1002/14651858. CD003766.pub3. This review contains 21 studies involving 15,061 participants in 15 countries.

Cochrane PEARLS Practical Evidence About Real Life Situations. No. 318, July 2011.
Written by Brian R McAvoy. Published by the Cochrane Primary Care Group

Category: W. Pregnancy, Family Planning. Keywords: labour, support, childbirth, delivery, cesarean section
Synopsis edited by Dr Linda French, Toledo, Ohio. Posted on Global Family Doctor 27 September 2011

Pearls are an independent product of the Cochrane primary care group and are meant for educational use and not to guide clinical care

To obtain Pearls directly, sign up here for the english language version

Pearls are an independent product of the Cochrane primary care group and are meant for educational use and not to guide clinical care.